Availability of Outpatient Child Psychiatric Care During COVID-19: A Simulated-Patient Study in Three U.S. Cities.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors sought to ascertain the availability of outpatient child psychiatric appointments in three U.S. cities. METHODS: Using a simulated-patient methodology, investigators called 322 psychiatrists who were listed in a major insurer's database for three U.S. cities, and they attempted to make appointments for a child with three payment types: Blue Cross-Blue Shield, Medicaid, and self-pay. RESULTS: Initial appointments were available 11% of the time, and it was most difficult to obtain an appointment under Medicaid coverage. Nineteen percent of phone numbers were wrong, and 25% of psychiatrists were not accepting new patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results are concerning given the current mental health crisis among youths and suggest the need for more psychiatrists, higher reimbursement rates for psychiatric services, and continued efforts to increase access to care. This study also highlights the need for insurance companies to maintain accurate information in their databases.

Eco-Friendly Hierarchical Nanoporous Microfiber Respirator Filters Fabricated Using Rotary Jet Spinning Technology (RJS)

The current global health crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) has increased the use of personal protective equipment, especially face masks, leading to the disposal of a large amount of plastic waste causing an environmental crisis due to the use of non-biodegradable and non-recyclable polymers, such as polypropylene and polyester. In this work, an eco-friendly biopolymer, polylactic acid (PLA), was used to manufacture hierarchical nanoporous microfiber biofilters via a single-step rotary jet spinning (RJS) technique. The process parameters that aid the formation of nanoporosity within the microfibers were discussed. The microstructure of the fibers was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a noninvasive X-ray microtomography (XRM) technique was employed to study the three-dimensional (3D) morphology and the porous architecture. Particulate matter (PM) and aerosol filtration efficiency were tested by OSHA standards with a broad range (10-1000 nm) of aerosolized saline droplets. The viral penetration efficiency was tested using the phi X174 bacteriophage (similar to 25 nm) with an envelope, mimicking the spike protein structure of SARS-CoV-2. Although these fibers have a similar size used in N95 filters, the developed biofilters present superior filtration efficiency (similar to 99%) while retaining better breathability (<4% pressure drop) than N95 respirator filters.

Simulation of COVID-19 Ultraviolet Disinfection Using Coupled Ray Tracing and CFD

Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiance (UVGI) is the effective technique of inactivating disease-causing bacteria, mould spores, fungi, and viruses using ultraviolet radiation. In this study, we seek to quantify the efficacy and COVID-19 infection risk reduction achieved by UVGI in the upper unoccupied zone of a room so that we may specify the type and placement of UVGI emitters optimally. We present a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based approach to model disinfection of aerosolized pathogens in a non-uniform ultraviolet field with mixing driven by air exchange and temperature gradients. We validate our CFD against simple calculation methods for UVGI effectiveness in well mixed spaces, and we integrate it with the Wells-Riley model of airborne infection risk to assess the relative benefit of UVGI with and against other measures. We demonstrate an order of magnitude reduction in infection risk as a result of applying UVGI, as well as the ability to quantify infection risk in non-well-mixed settings where simplified calculations methods do not apply. © International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2022

Eco-Friendly Hierarchical Nanoporous Microfiber Respirator Filters Fabricated Using Rotary Jet Spinning Technology (RJS)

The current global health crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) has increased the use of personal protective equipment, especially face masks, leading to the disposal of a large amount of plastic waste causing an environmental crisis due to the use of non-biodegradable and non-recyclable polymers, such as polypropylene and polyester. In this work, an eco-friendly biopolymer, polylactic acid (PLA), was used to manufacture hierarchical nanoporous microfiber biofilters via a single-step rotary jet spinning (RJS) technique. The process parameters that aid the formation of nanoporosity within the microfibers were discussed. The microstructure of the fibers was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a noninvasive X-ray microtomography (XRM) technique was employed to study the three-dimensional (3D) morphology and the porous architecture. Particulate matter (PM) and aerosol filtration efficiency were tested by OSHA standards with a broad range (10-1000 nm) of aerosolized saline droplets. The viral penetration efficiency was tested using the ΦX174 bacteriophage (∼25 nm) with an envelope, mimicking the spike protein structure of SARS-CoV-2. Although these fibers have a similar size used in N95 filters, the developed biofilters present superior filtration efficiency (∼99%) while retaining better breathability (<4% pressure drop) than N95 respirator filters. © 2023 American Chemical Society

Consumer experience of mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from an Australian mental health system

COVID-19 has increased the need for mental health care but disrupted its delivery. We examined impacts of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer experience of NSW hospital and community mental health services, compared to their pre-COVID baseline. We also examined whether increased telehealth use was associated with changes in the quantity or experience of community mental health care. Data were 73,488 Your Experience of Service (YES) surveys from state mental health services in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, grouped into three periods: pre-COVID (January 2018 to March 2020), early-COVID (April to June 2020) and stable-COVID (July to December 2020). Experience scores were compared using mixed effects ordinal logistic regression. Supplementary questions on telehealth and community care (n=621) were examined by multinomial logistic regression. Experience scores improved significantly during the early-COVID period for community consumers and during the stable-COVID period for hospital consumers. Of community clients, 78% received some or all care by telehealth. Positive experience was more likely when most or all care was by telehealth and the amount of care increased. A reduced quantity of care, regardless of care modality, was the strongest predictor of worse experience. Increased service provision and telehealth support were well received over the first year of the pandemic. When contact hours are reduced due to COVID-19 risk mitigation strategies, it is vital to provide alternative methods of care such as telephone, or internet support, rather than just reducing face to face contact hours. © The Author(s), 2022.

Clinical pharmacist's views on the role of alpha-2-agonists in practice and research for the management of agitation, sedation and delirium (ASD)

Introduction: Patients in the intensive care (ICU) commonly receive analgesics and sedatives to facilitate mechanical ventilation. Recommendations suggest patients are kept as lightly sedated as feasible. Studies report an inconsistent association between deep sedation, prolonged ventilation and ICU stay.1 Opinions around patients 'wakefulness' include discomfort and the potential increased prevalence of psychological morbidity.2 Alpha-2-agonists (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) are agents used in ASD management and reported to produce lighter sedation. The aim of this project was to explore ICU pharmacist's perspective on ASD practice over UK. Objectives: • Explore ICU pharmacist's views on: ASD practices, sedation research priority, importance of A2B clinical trial and the impact of Covid19. • Determine the prevalence of clonidine and dexmedetomidine prescribing. Methods: An online survey was devised on SurveyMonkey. The survey was designed in 2 sections: -1. Respondents provided responses based on a 'point prevalence' of clonidine and dexmedetomidine prescriptions, on day of completion. 2. Their local ICU sedation practice, their views on priority of sedation research, the A2B study and whether they believed ASD was more challenging during the Covid19 pandemic. The online survey was distributed via the UK Clinical Pharmacy Association Critical Care Group (UKCPA CCG), the NIHR Critical Care National Speciality Group (NSG), the UK Critical Care Research Group and Twitter. The survey remained active for 12 weeks from 30.3.2021 with reminders sent for completion every fortnight. Results: There were 121 respondents, all but 1 were ICU pharmacists. There are approximately 243 ICU pharmacist posts in the UK, this represents a response rate of approximately 50%. 37 (30%) of respondent reported clonidine (but not dexmedetomidine) was prescribed in their ICU;7 (6%) described dexmedetomidine only;and 76 (63%) reported both. In describing ASD during Covid-19 pandemic, 107 (88%) respondents reported it had become more challenging. 83 (69%) of respondents stated that clonidine usage increased during the pandemic (27 (22%) no change). 46 (39%) stated that dexmedetomidine usage increased during the pandemic (50 (42%) no change). Among the respondents 98 (81%) 'strongly agreed', and 20 (17%) 'agreed' that research involving ASD is a priority. A2B is set to compare clinical and cost effectiveness of propofol, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine as primary sedative for ICU patients. 49 (40%) of respondents reported participating in A2B. 65 (54%) respondents felt that A2B was a 'very important', and 63 (52%) said it was an 'important' research question. Conclusion: This survey reported widespread use of alpha-2-agonists in ASD practice. Almost two-thirds of ICUs report using both agents. Clonidine use is the most prevalent. Given the paucity of high quality clinical effectiveness and safety data for this drug, clinical trials which assess clinical effectiveness, including ASD are a priority. Respondents endorsed that ASD research is a priority, with ASD management much more challenging during the Covid19 pandemic. Limitations include that the design was a brief online survey;although had a high pharmacist response it did not incorporate the views of other members of the ICU team.

COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and solutions from the cardiology pharmacist's perspective.

The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) challenges pharmacists worldwide. Alongside other specialized pharmacists, we re-evaluated daily processes and therapies used to treat COVID-19 patients within our institutions from a cardiovascular perspective and share what we have learned. To develop a collaborative approach for cardiology issues and concerns in the care of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients by drawing on the experiences of cardiology pharmacists across the country. On March 26, 2020, a conference call was convened composed of 24 cardiology residency-trained pharmacists (23 actively practicing in cardiology and 1 in critical care) from 16 institutions across the United States to discuss cardiology issues each have encountered with COVID-19 patients. Discussion centered around providing optimal pharmaceutical care while limiting staff exposure. The collaborative of pharmacists found for the ST-elevation myocardial infarction patient, many institutions were diverting COVID-19 rule-out patients to their Emergency Department (ED). Thrombolytics are an alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) allowing for timely treatment of patients and decreased staff exposure. An emergency response grab and go kit includes initial drugs and airway equipment so the patient can be treated and the cart can be left outside the room. Cardiology pharmacists have developed policies and procedures to address monitoring of QT prolonging medications, the use of inhaled prostacyclins, and national drug shortages. Technology has allowed us to practice social distancing, while staying in close contact with our teams, patients, and colleagues and continuing to teach. Residents are engaged in unique decision-making processes with their preceptors and assist as pharmacist extenders. Cardiology pharmacists are in a unique position to work with other pharmacists and health care professionals to implement safe and effective practice changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments are necessary in rapidly changing times.

Outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 survivors and caregivers: a case study-centred narrative review Devenir des survivants et des soignants gravement atteints par la COVID-19 : une revue narrative centrée sur une étude de cas

Purpose Critical illness is a transformative experience for both patients and their family members. For COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), survival may be the start of a long road to recovery. Our knowledge of the post-ICU long-term sequelae of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) may inform our understanding and management of the long-term effects of COVID-19. Source We identified international and Canadian epidemiologic data on ICU admissions for COVID-19, COVID-19 pathophysiology, emerging ICU practice patterns, early reports of long-term outcomes, and federal support programs for survivors and their families. Centred around an illustrating case study, we applied relevant literature from ARDS and SARS to contextualize knowledge within emerging COVID-19 research and extrapolate findings to future long-term outcomes. Principal findings COVID-19 is a multisystem disease with unknown long-term morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is distinct and unique from ARDS, SARS, and critical illness. Nevertheless, based on initial reports of critical care management for COVID-19 and the varied injurious supportive practices employed in the ICU, patients and families are at risk for post-intensive care syndrome. The distinct incremental risk of COVID-19 multiple organ dysfunction is unknown. The risk of mood disorders in family members may be further exacerbated by imposed isolation and stigma. Conclusion Emerging literature on COVID-19 outcomes suggests some similarities with those of ARDS/SARS and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The pathophysiology of COVID-19 is presented here in the context of early outcome data and to inform an agenda for longitudinal research for patients and families.

Outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 survivors and caregivers: a case study-centred narrative review.

PURPOSE: Critical illness is a transformative experience for both patients and their family members. For COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), survival may be the start of a long road to recovery. Our knowledge of the post-ICU long-term sequelae of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) may inform our understanding and management of the long-term effects of COVID-19. SOURCE: We identified international and Canadian epidemiologic data on ICU admissions for COVID-19, COVID-19 pathophysiology, emerging ICU practice patterns, early reports of long-term outcomes, and federal support programs for survivors and their families. Centred around an illustrating case study, we applied relevant literature from ARDS and SARS to contextualize knowledge within emerging COVID-19 research and extrapolate findings to future long-term outcomes. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: COVID-19 is a multisystem disease with unknown long-term morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is distinct and unique from ARDS, SARS, and critical illness. Nevertheless, based on initial reports of critical care management for COVID-19 and the varied injurious supportive practices employed in the ICU, patients and families are at risk for post-intensive care syndrome. The distinct incremental risk of COVID-19 multiple organ dysfunction is unknown. The risk of mood disorders in family members may be further exacerbated by imposed isolation and stigma. CONCLUSION: Emerging literature on COVID-19 outcomes suggests some similarities with those of ARDS/SARS and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The pathophysiology of COVID-19 is presented here in the context of early outcome data and to inform an agenda for longitudinal research for patients and families.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les maladies au stade critique constituent une expérience bouleversante tant pour les patients que pour leurs proches. Pour les patients atteints de la COVID-19 admis aux soins intensifs (USI), la survie peut être le début d'un long parcours vers la guérison. Notre connaissance des séquelles à long terme post-USI d'un syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë (SDRA) ou d'un syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS) pourrait éclairer notre compréhension et notre prise en charge des effets à long terme de la COVID-19. SOURCES: Nous avons identifié des données épidémiologiques internationales et canadiennes sur les admissions aux soins intensifs pour la COVID-19, la physiopathologie de la COVID-19, les schémas de pratique émergents en soins intensifs, les premiers rapports sur les issues à long terme et les programmes de soutien fédéraux pour les survivants et leurs familles. En nous centrant autour d'une étude de cas pour illustrer notre propos, nous avons appliqué la littérature pertinente à propos du SDRA et du SRAS afin de contextualiser les connaissances de la recherche émergente sur la COVID-19 et extrapoler les conclusions aux futures issues à long terme. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: La COVID-19 est une maladie multisystémique dont la morbidité et la mortalité à long terme sont inconnues. Sa physiopathologie est unique et distincte du SDRA, du SRAS et des maladies graves. Néanmoins, en nous fondant sur les rapports initiaux de prise en charge aux soins intensifs de la COVID-19 et sur les diverses pratiques de support préjudiciables utilisées aux soins intensifs, les patients et les familles sont à risque de syndrome post-soins intensifs. Le risque distinct supplémentaire de dysfonctionnement multiviscéral de la COVID-19 est inconnu. Le risque de troubles de l'humeur chez les proches peut être encore exacerbé par l'isolement imposé et la stigmatisation. CONCLUSION: La littérature émergente sur les issues de la COVID-19 suggère certaines similitudes avec celles du SDRA/SRAS et de la ventilation mécanique prolongée. La physiopathologie de la COVID-19 est présentée ici dans le contexte des premières données sur les issues et pour éclairer un programme de recherche longitudinale pour les patients et leurs familles.

Physician Scientists Of Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow.

While the separate roles of physicians and scientists are well defined, the role of a physician scientist is broad and variable. In today's society, physician scientists are seen as a hybrid between the two fields and they are, therefore, expected to be key to the translation of biomedical research into clinical care. This article offers a narrative review on physician scientists and endeavours to answer whether there is an ongoing need for physician scientists today. The historical role of physician scientists is discussed and compared with physician scientists of the 21st century. Fundamental differences and similarities between the separate roles of physicians and scientists are examined as well as the current state of bench to bedside research. Finally, the ability of 21st century physician scientists to impact their respective medical and scientific fields in comparison to non-physician scientists will be discussed. This paper speculates as to why numbers of physician scientists are dwindling and uses the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of rapid translational research. Ultimately, we suggest that physician scientists are important and may have the most impact on their field by working to connect bedside and bench rather than simply working separately in the bedside and bench. To do this, physician scientists may need to lead clinical research teams composed of individuals from diverse training backgrounds.

Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy in COVID-19 Versus Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially fatal complication of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Binding of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, to its viral receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), results in viral entry and may cause AKI. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequencies of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and compared those frequencies with patients who were infected by respiratory viruses that bind or downregulate ACE2 (ACE2-associated viruses) and viruses that do not bind nor downregulate ACE2 (non-ACE2-associated viruses). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Observational studies on COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections reporting AKI and RRT were included. The exclusion criteria were non-English articles, non-peer-reviewed articles, review articles, studies that included patients under the age of 18, studies including fewer than 10 patients, and studies not reporting AKI and RRT rates. PATIENTS: Adult COVID-19, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and influenza patients. MEASUREMENTS: We extracted the following data from the included studies: author, year, study location, age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, shock, vasopressor use, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU mortality, AKI, and RRT. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles reporting AKI or RRT. AKI was defined by authors of included studies. Critical illness was defined by ICU admission. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates for the AKI and RRT rate within each virus group using a random intercept logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 23 655 hospitalized, critically ill COVID-19 patients, AKI frequencies were not significantly different between COVID-19 patients (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-57%) and critically ill patients infected with ACE2-associated (56%, 95% CI: 37%-74%, P = .610) or non-ACE2-associated viruses (63%, 95% CI: 43%-79%, P = .255). Pooled RRT rates were also not significantly different between critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (20%, 95% CI: 16%-24%) and ACE2-associated viruses (18%, 95% CI: 8%-33%, P = .747). RRT rates for both COVID-19 and ACE2-associated viruses were significantly different (P < .001 for both) from non-ACE2-associated viruses (49%, 95% CI: 44%-54%). After adjusting for shock or vasopressor use, AKI and RRT rates were not significantly different between groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the heterogeneity of definitions of AKI that were used across different virus studies. We could not match severity of infection or do propensity matching across studies. Most of the included studies were conducted in retrospective fashion. Last, we did not include non-English publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that viral ACE2 association does not significantly alter the rates of AKI and RRT among critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, the rate of RRT is lower in patients with COVID-19 or ACE2-associated viruses when compared with patients infected with non-ACE2-binding viruses, which might partly be due to the lower frequencies of shock and use of vasopressors in these two virus groups. Prospective studies are necessary to demonstrate whether modulation of the ACE2 axis with Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors impacts the rates of AKI and whether they are beneficial or harmful in COVID-19 patients.

MISE EN CONTEXTE: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) est une complication potentiellement mortelle de la maladie à coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Obligatoire du Coronavirus 2 du Syndrome Respiratoire Aigu Sévère (SARS-CoV-2), le virus responsable du COVID-19, à son récepteur, l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine 2 (ACE2), entraîne une entrée virale et peut provoquer une IRA. OBJECTIFS DE L'ÉTUDE: Nous avons effectué une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des fréquences de l'IRA et de la thérapie de remplacement renal (RRT) chez les patients COVID-19 gravement malades et a comparé ces fréquences avec les patients qui ont été infectés par des voies respiratoires virus qui lient ou régulent négativement l'ACE2 (virus associés à l'ACE2) et les virus qui ne régulent pas négativement ni ne lient l'ACE2 (virus non associés à l'ACE2). CADRE ET TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Revue systématique et méta-analyse. Des études d'observation sur le COVID-19 et d'autres infections virales respiratoires signalant une AKI et une RRT ont été incluses. Les critères d'exclusion étaient des articles non anglophones, des articles non évalués par des pairs, des articles de revue, des études incluant des patients moins de 18 ans, les études incluant moins de 10 patients et les études ne rapportant pas les taux d'IRA et de RRT. PATIENTS: Adultes COVID-19, syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS), syndrome respiratoire du Moyen-Orient (MERS) et malades de la grippe. MESURES: Nous avons extrait les données suivantes des études incluses : auteur, année, lieu de l'étude, âge, sexe, race, diabète sucré, hypertension, maladie rénale chronique, état de choc, utilisation de vasopresseurs, mortalité, admission en unité de soins intensifs (USI), Mortalité en soins intensifs, AKI et RRT. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons systématiquement recherché dans PubMed et EMBASE les articles rapportant AKI ou RRT. AKI a été défini par les auteurs des études incluses. La maladie grave a été définie par l'admission aux soins intensifs. Nous avons effectué une méta-analyse à effets aléatoires pour calculer estimations regroupées pour le taux d'IRA et de RRT au sein de chaque groupe de virus à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logistique d'interception aléatoire. RÉSULTATS: Sur 23 655 patients hospitalisés et gravement malades COVID-19, les fréquences AKI n'étaient pas significativement différentes entre patients COVID-19 (51 %, intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC] : 44 %-57 %) et patients gravement malades infectés par l'ACE2 associé (56 %, IC à 95 % : 37 % à 74 %, P = 0,610) ou des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (63 %, IC à 95 % : 43 % à 79 %, P = 0,255). Tarifs RRT groupés n'étaient pas non plus significativement différents entre les patients hospitalisés gravement malades atteints de COVID-19 (20 %, IC à 95 % : 16 % à 24 %) et virus associés à l'ACE2 (18 %, IC à 95 % : 8 % à 33 %, P = 0,747). Taux de RRT pour les virus associés au COVID-19 et à l'ACE2 étaient significativement différents (P < 0,001 pour les deux) des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (49 %, IC à 95 % : 44 % à 54 %). Après ajustement pour le choc ou l'utilisation de vasopresseurs, les taux d'IRA et de RRT n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les groupes. LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: Les limites de cette étude incluent l'hétérogénéité des définitions de l'IRA qui ont été utilisées pour différents virus études. Nous n'avons pas pu faire correspondre la gravité de l'infection ou faire une correspondance de propension entre les études. La plupart des études incluses ont été menées de manière rétrospective. Enfin, nous n'avons pas inclus les publications non anglophones. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats suggèrent que l'association virale ACE2 ne modifie pas de manière significative les taux d'IRA et de RRT parmi les patients gravement malades admis aux soins intensifs. Cependant, le taux de RRT est plus faible chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ou associés à l'ACE2 virus par rapport aux patients infectés par des virus ne se liant pas à l'ACE2, ce qui pourrait être dû en partie à la plus faible fréquences de choc et utilisation de vasopresseurs dans ces deux groupes de virus. Des études prospectives sont nécessaires pour démontrer si la modulation de l'axe ACE2 avec les inhibiteurs du système rénine-angiotensine a un impact sur les taux d'IRA et si ells sont bénéfiques ou nocifs chez les patients COVID-19.

PHYSICIAN SCIENTISTS OF YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW

While the separate roles of physicians and scientists are well defined, the role of a physician scientist is broad and variable. In today's society, physician scientists are seen as a hybrid between the two fields and they are, therefore, expected to be key to the translation of biomedical research into clinical care. This article offers a narrative review on physician scientists and endeavours to answer whether there is an ongoing need for physician scientists today. The historical role of physician scientists is discussed and compared with physician scientists of the 21st century. Fundamental differences and similarities between the separate roles of physicians and scientists are examined as well as the current state of bench to bedside research. Finally, the ability of 21st century physician scientists to impact their respective medical and scientific fields in comparison to non-physician scientists will be discussed. This paper speculates as to why numbers of physician scientists are dwindling and uses the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of rapid translational research. Ultimately, we suggest that physician scientists are important and may have the most impact on their field by working to connect bedside and bench rather than simply working separately in the bedside and bench. To do this, physician scientists may need to lead clinical research teams composed of individuals from diverse training backgrounds.

Complications of Critical COVID-19: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations for the Mechanically Ventilated Patient.

Patients admitted to the ICU with critical COVID-19 often require prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. Difficulty weaning, lack of progress, and clinical deterioration are commonly encountered. These conditions should prompt a thorough evaluation for persistent or untreated manifestations of COVID-19, as well as complications from COVID-19 and its various treatments. Inflammation may persist and lead to fibroproliferative changes in the lungs. Infectious complications may arise including bacterial superinfection in the earlier stages of disease. Use of immunosuppressants may lead to the dissemination of latent infections, and to opportunistic infections. Venous thromboembolic disease is common, as are certain neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 including delirium and stroke. High levels of ventilatory support may lead to ventilator-induced injury to the lungs and diaphragm. We present diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for the mechanically ventilated patient with COVID-19 who shows persistent or worsening signs of critical illness, and we offer an approach to treating this complex but common scenario.

Examining the associations among moral injury, difficulties with emotion regulation, and symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and stress among Canadian military members and Veterans: A preliminary study

Introduction: Moral injury (MI) refers to the psychological distress associated with perceived betrayals or perceived transgressions of one’s moral values. It has been studied primarily among military personnel and Veterans and has been found to be associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and other psychiatric symptoms. Recently, research has begun to investigate MI and its potential risk factors. Difficulties with emotion regulation (ER), which refers to difficulties with managing and moderating emotions, is a transdiagnostic factor associated with several psychiatric conditions, including PTSD, depression, and anxiety. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relations among MI;symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and stress;and difficulties with ER in a sample of Canadian military personnel and Veterans. A secondary aim was to discuss the potential relevance of these relations for military personnel, Veterans, and front-line health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Assessments of MI, PTSD, depression, anxiety, stress, and difficulties with ER were administered to Canadian military personnel and Veterans. Correlational analyses were used to assess the relation of MI to these symptoms. Results: Increased levels of MI were associated with avoidance and alterations in mood and cognition symptom clusters of PTSD. Perceived betrayals were also significantly correlated with PTSD-related alterations in mood and cognition symptoms. Symptoms of PTSD were significantly associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. Difficulties with ER were significantly correlated with symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and stress, but not with MI (p = 0.07). Discussion: These results reveal an association between MI and specific symptom clusters of PTSD, and they highlight the association between difficulties with ER and symptoms of psychiatric illness among Canadian military personnel and Veterans. The potential implications of these findings and future work examining MI in military personnel, Veterans, and front-line health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Defence, (2020).

Race, Power, and COVID-19: A Call for Advocacy within Bioethics.

Events in 2020 have sparked a reimagination of how both individuals and institutions should consider race, power, health, and marginalization in society. In a response to these developments, we examine the current and past limitations of the ways in which bioethicists have considered race and, more generally, discourses of marginalization. We argue that the foundational principle of justice necessitates that bioethics, as an institution, maintain an active voice against systemic injustice. To carry out this charge, bioethics as a field should promote alternative narratives-"counter storytelling"-to the mainstream voices that have traditionally been heard and accepted, largely without opposition. Additionally, we engage with both Post-Colonial and Critical Race Theory, which we believe are important tools for bioethics in pursuit of equity. Ultimately, we advocate for a proactive form of bioethics that actively resists and denounces injustice and which considers a much wider variety of voices about justice than bioethics has historically considered.